BE-related: WTC 7

[Thomas Eckhardt]

Am 26.05.2020 um 19:48 schrieb David Morris:

> I've said it before:  Controlled demolition (implosion) requires explosives
> at columns that can't be hidden in an occupied building, and they can't be
> installed overnight.  That conspiracy is just BS.

Sherlock Holmes' reply: "How often have I said to you that when you have 
eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be 
the truth?"

The UAF report has eliminated the impossible by proving the blindingly 
obvious: WTC 7 could not have collapsed the way it did because of office 
fires. Whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

NIST has until August 15 to respond to a request for correction based on 
the UAF report:

'Family members of those who died on September 11, 2001, joined building 
experts earlier today in submitting a “request for correction” to the 
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding its 2008 
report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.'

'If NIST elects not to take corrective action, it must provide a 
“point-by-point response to any relevant data quality arguments 
contained in the request.” The request notes that if NIST does not 
provide a point-by-point response, NIST will have denied the request “in 
an arbitrary and capricious manner,” which would set the stage for legal 
action to force compliance.'

https://www.ae911truth.org/nist