BE-related: WTC 7

[Mark Kohut]

Like Holmes famous locked room mystery, by analogy:

“The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the
near-simultaneous failure of every column.”

The four-year study was funded by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a
nonprofit organization representing more than 3,000 architects and
engineers who have signed the organization’s petition calling for a new
investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers
on 9/11.

Models are made with data input. They had four over the four years. I
suggest their modeling is incorrect somehow. Unless of course they are
right in the answer above. Which is not an elimination of the impossible.

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:52 PM Thomas Eckhardt <thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de>
wrote:

> Am 26.05.2020 um 19:48 schrieb David Morris:
>
> > I've said it before:  Controlled demolition (implosion) requires
> explosives
> > at columns that can't be hidden in an occupied building, and they can't
> be
> > installed overnight.  That conspiracy is just BS.
>
> Sherlock Holmes' reply: "How often have I said to you that when you have
> eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be
> the truth?"
>
> The UAF report has eliminated the impossible by proving the blindingly
> obvious: WTC 7 could not have collapsed the way it did because of office
> fires. Whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
>
> NIST has until August 15 to respond to a request for correction based on
> the UAF report:
>
> 'Family members of those who died on September 11, 2001, joined building
> experts earlier today in submitting a “request for correction” to the
> National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding its 2008
> report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.'
>
> 'If NIST elects not to take corrective action, it must provide a
> “point-by-point response to any relevant data quality arguments
> contained in the request.” The request notes that if NIST does not
> provide a point-by-point response, NIST will have denied the request “in
> an arbitrary and capricious manner,” which would set the stage for legal
> action to force compliance.'
>
> https://www.ae911truth.org/nist
>
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>