BE-related: WTC 7

[David Morris]

Third point:  After the fall of the twin towers, who gives a fuck about
piddling WTC7?  Why would any conspiracist have given a shit, and included
it in their plans?

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:25 PM David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> First of all, you don't respond to my main point: controlled demolition
> (implosion) isn't possible in an occupied office tower without EVERYONE
> seeing the explosives being placed.  It can't get more simple than that.
> Do you care to respond?
>
> Second, your experts are highly suspect.
>
> David Morris
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 3:52 PM Thomas Eckhardt <
> thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 26.05.2020 um 19:48 schrieb David Morris:
>>
>> > I've said it before:  Controlled demolition (implosion) requires
>> explosives
>> > at columns that can't be hidden in an occupied building, and they can't
>> be
>> > installed overnight.  That conspiracy is just BS.
>>
>> Sherlock Holmes' reply: "How often have I said to you that when you have
>> eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be
>> the truth?"
>>
>> The UAF report has eliminated the impossible by proving the blindingly
>> obvious: WTC 7 could not have collapsed the way it did because of office
>> fires. Whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
>>
>> NIST has until August 15 to respond to a request for correction based on
>> the UAF report:
>>
>> 'Family members of those who died on September 11, 2001, joined building
>> experts earlier today in submitting a “request for correction” to the
>> National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding its 2008
>> report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.'
>>
>> 'If NIST elects not to take corrective action, it must provide a
>> “point-by-point response to any relevant data quality arguments
>> contained in the request.” The request notes that if NIST does not
>> provide a point-by-point response, NIST will have denied the request “in
>> an arbitrary and capricious manner,” which would set the stage for legal
>> action to force compliance.'
>>
>> https://www.ae911truth.org/nist
>>
>>