BE-related: WTC 7

[Mark Kohut]

LOL. Mic drop. 



Sent from my iPhone

> On May 26, 2020, at 6:28 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Third point:  After the fall of the twin towers, who gives a fuck about
> piddling WTC7?  Why would any conspiracist have given a shit, and included
> it in their plans?
> 
>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:25 PM David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> First of all, you don't respond to my main point: controlled demolition
>> (implosion) isn't possible in an occupied office tower without EVERYONE
>> seeing the explosives being placed.  It can't get more simple than that.
>> Do you care to respond?
>> 
>> Second, your experts are highly suspect.
>> 
>> David Morris
>> 
>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 3:52 PM Thomas Eckhardt <
>> thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>> 
>>>> Am 26.05.2020 um 19:48 schrieb David Morris:
>>> 
>>>> I've said it before:  Controlled demolition (implosion) requires
>>> explosives
>>>> at columns that can't be hidden in an occupied building, and they can't
>>> be
>>>> installed overnight.  That conspiracy is just BS.
>>> 
>>> Sherlock Holmes' reply: "How often have I said to you that when you have
>>> eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be
>>> the truth?"
>>> 
>>> The UAF report has eliminated the impossible by proving the blindingly
>>> obvious: WTC 7 could not have collapsed the way it did because of office
>>> fires. Whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
>>> 
>>> NIST has until August 15 to respond to a request for correction based on
>>> the UAF report:
>>> 
>>> 'Family members of those who died on September 11, 2001, joined building
>>> experts earlier today in submitting a “request for correction” to the
>>> National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding its 2008
>>> report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.'
>>> 
>>> 'If NIST elects not to take corrective action, it must provide a
>>> “point-by-point response to any relevant data quality arguments
>>> contained in the request.” The request notes that if NIST does not
>>> provide a point-by-point response, NIST will have denied the request “in
>>> an arbitrary and capricious manner,” which would set the stage for legal
>>> action to force compliance.'
>>> 
>>> https://www.ae911truth.org/nist
>>> 
>>> 
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l