BE-related: WTC 7
David Morris
fqmorris at gmail.com
Wed May 27 15:46:09 UTC 2020
You still refuse to address this most basic question, nicely stated by Mr
Thibodeau:
"And, again, yes, where is the video footage of dozens of workmen wiring it
up for demolition, with highly visible explosive charges, days in advance?"
All other questions are moot before this one is answered.
David Morris
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:06 AM Thomas Eckhardt <
thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:
> Am 27.05.2020 um 13:52 schrieb Mark Thibodeau:
>
> > It's not so much the fire as the fact that TWO OF THE BIGGEST BUILDINGS
> > IN THE FUCKING WORLD HAD JUST BASICALLY FALLEN DOWN RIGHT ON FUCKING TOP
> > OF BUILDING SEVEN that caused it to fall.
>
> This appears to be a new hypothesis. Is it from a peer-reviewed
> scientific study?
>
> This is:
>
> "Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable
> to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken
> place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the
> building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with
> approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement
> of the exterior."
>
> http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
>
>
>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list