BE-related: WTC 7

[Mark Thibodeau]

Don't worry, T.E. I used to be just like you, too, before I woke up.

I'm not about to wade into an attempted debunking of an argument that is
based on (literally) hundreds of gigabytes worth of computer simulations in
and thousands of pages of gobbledygook, all amounting to what seems to me
like the single biggest and most sinister, insanity-inducing conspiracy
theorist time-trap ever conceived by mortal man. It's been 20 years since
9/11. All the videos of molten metal, thermite microparticles, "explosive"
puffs, "Just pull its", architects and engineers gazing wide-eyed at
footage of building 7, "it fell in its footprints!", "telltale kinks!",
etc, etc, etc, etc, have amounted to... what? A big fat bolus of Sweet Fuck
All. That's what.

Do I think rogue elements in the American government or intelligence
agencies might have played a role in the events of 9/11? Actually, yes, I
do suspect that.

Do I believe the "controlled demolition" theories? No. Because they're
fucking ridiculous, for any number of reasons. And I say this as probably
one of the few Pynchon List members who has actually worked with dynamite
and (far more dangerous) blasting caps while working summers with my
father, who was an explosives expert taught by the US Army, who brought his
training into his civilian job as a construction foreman.

So pardon me if I refuse to spend any more time on this ridiculous tarbaby.

Love you guys!
Jerky

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:06 AM Thomas Eckhardt <
thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:

> Am 27.05.2020 um 13:52 schrieb Mark Thibodeau:
>
> > It's not so much the fire as the fact that TWO OF THE BIGGEST BUILDINGS
> > IN THE FUCKING WORLD HAD JUST BASICALLY FALLEN DOWN RIGHT ON FUCKING TOP
> > OF BUILDING SEVEN that caused it to fall.
>
> This appears to be a new hypothesis. Is it from a peer-reviewed
> scientific study?
>
> This is:
>
> "Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable
> to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken
> place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the
> building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with
> approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement
> of the exterior."
>
> http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
>
>
>