AW: Re: Serious news from Europe on Ukraine

Hübschräuber huebschraeuber at protonmail.com
Wed Feb 9 21:51:22 UTC 2022


"The treaty was dead on day one after its signing as Moscow’s regular army with their proxies attacked and took Debaltseve."

Some time ago, if I remember correctly, you chose not to address my reply to that talking point.

Here it is again:

-- This is a controversial claim. As you surely know but inexplicably fail to mention, Debaltseve was discussed in Minsk. Poroshenko did not admit that his troops were surrounded and therefore saw no reason for them to surrender:

"The most important question, the question of the ceasefire, threatened
to derail the whole meeting. Vladimir Putin presented his trump card.
His trump card is Debaltseve. In the small town in eastern Ukraine, 70
km northeast of Donetsk, 5000 men of the Ukrainian armed forces are
encircled. That's nearly a third of the soldiers Kiev currently has on
the front lines, one-sixth of all its forces. That weakened the
Ukrainian president's negotiating position. Putin demanded that
Ukrainian soldiers surrender before a cease-fire could even be
discussed. Poroshenko became agitated. There was no cauldron near
Debaltseve, he said. And the condition of Putin, with whom he is on
familiar terms, is totally unacceptable, he said. Never, never will he
hand over Debaltseve."

https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/die-verhandlungen-von-minsk-ein-russisches-spiel-13428669.html

As I understand it, Debaltseve was therefore not included in the agreement. --

Would you mind addressing the issue now?


More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list