Not Pynchon but Mischa and Grischa
Mark Kohut
mark.kohut at gmail.com
Sun Feb 13 23:27:43 UTC 2022
I feel a little sorry because you seemed like a nice guy. And you might be but means little against the crazy, colloquially understood.
My mind has no room for it, or I want it not to.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2022, at 6:16 PM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We went thru this and it did not mean that. You will always find some who say what you fear. “Retired military officials”, right. Who never lie for what they want; who don’t give context: like the necessity of negotiating with such a threat IF SHE said it straight. You have as I said then NO UNDERSTANDING of the nuances of what she said, when and why. And what it might mean. And might lead to.
>
> You decide the worst outcome in your head, as with all this Ukraine stuff and declare it.
>
> You are worse on Ukraine. 1100 of 450,000 for one..
> WW3 when the US and Allies say they will not go into UKRAINE? Do you listen to Biden over there? Do you not believe him like some, probably Joseph , don’t? No matter what he’s done as Pres in foreign policy. Do you and others know the difference different admistrstions make? No evidence.
> Imagine if I talked of Germany picking out whatever I wanted over how many years?
>
> I am done with your irreality, which you think the special truth. Done. As Morris says, you now mischaracterize and say “ I see your points” and that is not manifested. About these issues you’ve learned nothing, nothing over all these years,
> These beliefs are your foreign policy ( w other notions, I’m sure) these beliefs are you.
>
> I really do feel sorry for you tonight. You can call that condescension or self-deception, I don’t care.
> As Jochen is always saying Goodbye. ( he pops up to tell me I should be ashamed of myself)
>
> I’ll wait for the next Aquinas-infused Pynchon post.
>
> PS: after wanting the percentage to appear big in that last post, I couldn’t get it to go small. But you can always misread the reality. Take care.
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>>> On Feb 13, 2022, at 5:23 PM, Hübschräuber <huebschraeuber at protonmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> schrieb am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2022 um 20:13:
>>
>>> Besides Nazis, you see WW3 everywhere you look. The horror of Hillary Clinton to you
>>> up against your non-lying eyes about Trump and the Republicans. You jumped to WW 3 with me
>>> in talking about her in 2015....
>>
>>
>> I did.
>>
>> "Retired senior US military pilots are increasingly alarmed that Hillary Clinton’s proposal for “no-fly zones” in Syria could lead to a military confrontation with Russia that could escalate to levels that were previously unthinkable in the post-cold war world."
>>
>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/25/hillary-clinton-syria-no-fly-zones-russia-us-war
>>
>> It is really quite simple: Clinton had announced plans to establish a no-fly zone in Syria. This would have meant shooting down Russian aircraft. I cannot see how anyone can possibly dispute that this could have led to WW III.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list