Not P- But I have an itch...

[Justin Pittman]

...to see how the list will respond in your various ways to a thought, or
rather set of thoughts that both parallels and wildly intersects about 50%
each of what I've read. By all means, don't hold back.

A. I'm unoffendable.
2. What would it matter if I wasn't?
£. Unfettered response is academically prone.
C4. Who are any of you that I should cry over?

Please don't delete me until after I get some responses in, kosher?

Everyone loves uniformity in their own ways. Everyone hates uniformity in
their own ways.


I know, immediately it's "eww, yuck. He said Everyone. TWICE!"...Yes I did,
but hear me out if you will.

No matter where we fall on the infinitely recombinant and multiaxial plane
of existence as sentient or quasisentient or even suedovegitative
intellect/emotion/instinct state beings, a certain level of personal need
and/or preference for the definition and establishment of personal, social
small, social broad, and multisystem organizations and chaos mix defines
the standing modus operandi of our reaction layers to every elemental
variable we encounter. It is an unavoidable truth in a world with so few
durable lasting truths available for establishment. As my Grandmother used
to say, "Breathing, eating, and defecation are your only sure things in
life and death is the fourth thing you can count on when those three go
null." Turns out we're not even sure That old adage is going to be broadly
applicable for much longer, one way or another.

Obviously I digress, but the point is that nothing is ever perfect or as
optimized and complete as it will ever be until an advancement base jumps
platform and occupies a new evolution in environment based upon the old
while broken free from the constraints and inherent flaws it exhibited. It
will always come at a price. There will be nuances of humanities we will
never experience or have context in that escape our collective cognitive
scope. As an advance Gray in a favorite sci-fi of my childhood said, "We
needed you to fix the problem because we were too far advanced to be able
to consider less complicated answers that your species is still bound
inexorably to for your simplicity." In response, Samantha says, "So you
needed our help because we're not as smart as you?" and Thor says,
"Precisely". Obviously I paraphrase and it may not have been Sam that
replied, but give me a break, it was a LONG time ago. You get the
reference, now here is the drop.

Do you remember NES MBros? How about Win 98? IOS 1? AOS 1.2? Do you
remember terms of service and privacy policies that were three paragraphs
or less and on one page in one locale, no less? As I said, I get it, I
really do. At the same time, COME ON. Who has that many hours to spend
tracking down all the interconnecting factors involved in actually being
sure you understand the intricate level of soul binding legality you've
signed in digital blood as the tech continues to link and intertwine? It's
supposed to be that way, you may say. Well yeah, obviously, but if only
those who are the current definition of "vulnerable" or "at risk" are to be
penalized for it and the dream beyond previous hope and now in reach is
ultimate open shareholder/stakholdership of all the future of Transapia,
WHY DO THE ESTABLISHMENTS STILL HAVE THE TWISTER GAME APPLIED TO WHAT ONLY
WE HAVE INTEREST IN? The tech continues to advance. Ownership and merit
stake of value continue to be priority. The system isn't going anywhere,
folks. The measure and weigh is changing, yes. The herd is thinning, yes.
That doesn't change that we will still be in a system and we will still be
elementary to it and primarily, but for the first time, also primordially
different from and inconsequential to the oversight levels of control and
codification. We all dream of flying through the meta. It doesn't make any
of us evil. Evil is how few people on this earth will ever experience
flight even though the advancement and advantage that accompanied
expediting the biplane for the world wars occurred almost 100 years ago
now. Same concept.

Genius has always been the brain and heart of advancement. It has most
often had the best intentions. It has most often failed to let hubris or
hope give way to the reality of the foundational financiers control and
lack of altruistic sincerity. Shall we be yet another generation of Nikola
Tesla, Albert Einstein, Steve Jobs, and Mr. Robots? I hope not. It may be
that the back we no longer need to do the physical is the back as in, "only
way" we eliminate to our own despair. Thank you for your time and
attention.
I love you.
Be well.