Not P- But I have an itch...

[rich]

Long live the new flesh!

On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 4:29 AM Justin Pittman <atlasalways88 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> ...to see how the list will respond in your various ways to a thought, or
> rather set of thoughts that both parallels and wildly intersects about 50%
> each of what I've read. By all means, don't hold back.
>
> A. I'm unoffendable.
> 2. What would it matter if I wasn't?
> £. Unfettered response is academically prone.
> C4. Who are any of you that I should cry over?
>
> Please don't delete me until after I get some responses in, kosher?
>
> Everyone loves uniformity in their own ways. Everyone hates uniformity in
> their own ways.
>
>
> I know, immediately it's "eww, yuck. He said Everyone. TWICE!"...Yes I did,
> but hear me out if you will.
>
> No matter where we fall on the infinitely recombinant and multiaxial plane
> of existence as sentient or quasisentient or even suedovegitative
> intellect/emotion/instinct state beings, a certain level of personal need
> and/or preference for the definition and establishment of personal, social
> small, social broad, and multisystem organizations and chaos mix defines
> the standing modus operandi of our reaction layers to every elemental
> variable we encounter. It is an unavoidable truth in a world with so few
> durable lasting truths available for establishment. As my Grandmother used
> to say, "Breathing, eating, and defecation are your only sure things in
> life and death is the fourth thing you can count on when those three go
> null." Turns out we're not even sure That old adage is going to be broadly
> applicable for much longer, one way or another.
>
> Obviously I digress, but the point is that nothing is ever perfect or as
> optimized and complete as it will ever be until an advancement base jumps
> platform and occupies a new evolution in environment based upon the old
> while broken free from the constraints and inherent flaws it exhibited. It
> will always come at a price. There will be nuances of humanities we will
> never experience or have context in that escape our collective cognitive
> scope. As an advance Gray in a favorite sci-fi of my childhood said, "We
> needed you to fix the problem because we were too far advanced to be able
> to consider less complicated answers that your species is still bound
> inexorably to for your simplicity." In response, Samantha says, "So you
> needed our help because we're not as smart as you?" and Thor says,
> "Precisely". Obviously I paraphrase and it may not have been Sam that
> replied, but give me a break, it was a LONG time ago. You get the
> reference, now here is the drop.
>
> Do you remember NES MBros? How about Win 98? IOS 1? AOS 1.2? Do you
> remember terms of service and privacy policies that were three paragraphs
> or less and on one page in one locale, no less? As I said, I get it, I
> really do. At the same time, COME ON. Who has that many hours to spend
> tracking down all the interconnecting factors involved in actually being
> sure you understand the intricate level of soul binding legality you've
> signed in digital blood as the tech continues to link and intertwine? It's
> supposed to be that way, you may say. Well yeah, obviously, but if only
> those who are the current definition of "vulnerable" or "at risk" are to be
> penalized for it and the dream beyond previous hope and now in reach is
> ultimate open shareholder/stakholdership of all the future of Transapia,
> WHY DO THE ESTABLISHMENTS STILL HAVE THE TWISTER GAME APPLIED TO WHAT ONLY
> WE HAVE INTEREST IN? The tech continues to advance. Ownership and merit
> stake of value continue to be priority. The system isn't going anywhere,
> folks. The measure and weigh is changing, yes. The herd is thinning, yes.
> That doesn't change that we will still be in a system and we will still be
> elementary to it and primarily, but for the first time, also primordially
> different from and inconsequential to the oversight levels of control and
> codification. We all dream of flying through the meta. It doesn't make any
> of us evil. Evil is how few people on this earth will ever experience
> flight even though the advancement and advantage that accompanied
> expediting the biplane for the world wars occurred almost 100 years ago
> now. Same concept.
>
> Genius has always been the brain and heart of advancement. It has most
> often had the best intentions. It has most often failed to let hubris or
> hope give way to the reality of the foundational financiers control and
> lack of altruistic sincerity. Shall we be yet another generation of Nikola
> Tesla, Albert Einstein, Steve Jobs, and Mr. Robots? I hope not. It may be
> that the back we no longer need to do the physical is the back as in, "only
> way" we eliminate to our own despair. Thank you for your time and
> attention.
> I love you.
> Be well.
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>