Blue Lard

[David Morris]

Ah. Now you are offering a bit of framework, a few nails and nuts and a
napkin sketch. It’s a good start, but it begins to feel like a morality
conundrum (at best- Please not (Buddha help me) a scold). I prefer Kafka.

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:38 PM Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:

> O David,
>
> I'll take Why when ONLY for $100.
>
> Art is original, When a copy is attempted it is all fat. And, one of the
> seven types of ambiguity,
> when burnt (by the 20th Century) the puddle is left....
>
> Fake via The Recognitions; the Borges Pierre Menard story.
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:06 PM David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> *“clone famous Russian writers, who are then made to produce texts in the
>> style of their forebears.”*
>>
>> This description lost me right here. *How did they “make”* the famous
>
>
>> Russian writer clones produce texts? Since the text they are producing is
>> only a byproduct, what qualifies of clone mental activity produces Blue
>> Lard?
>>
>> Why is it the Blue Lard *ONLY produced when clones of famous Russian
>> writers attempt to “copy themselves*?”
>> --
>> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>>
>