Blue Lard

[Mark Kohut]

Nah.....just rich serial layering.....just embodied IDEAS which works if
the prose does.....i mean Pynchon? or
a surreal Gaddis/

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:31 PM David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ah. Now you are offering a bit of framework, a few nails and nuts and a
> napkin sketch. It’s a good start, but it begins to feel like a morality
> conundrum (at best- Please not (Buddha help me) a scold). I prefer Kafka.
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:38 PM Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> O David,
>>
>> I'll take Why when ONLY for $100.
>>
>> Art is original, When a copy is attempted it is all fat. And, one of the
>> seven types of ambiguity,
>> when burnt (by the 20th Century) the puddle is left....
>>
>> Fake via The Recognitions; the Borges Pierre Menard story.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:06 PM David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> *“clone famous Russian writers, who are then made to produce texts in the
>>> style of their forebears.”*
>>>
>>> This description lost me right here. *How did they “make”* the famous
>>
>>
>>> Russian writer clones produce texts? Since the text they are producing is
>>> only a byproduct, what qualifies of clone mental activity produces Blue
>>> Lard?
>>>
>>> Why is it the Blue Lard *ONLY produced when clones of famous Russian
>>> writers attempt to “copy themselves*?”
>>> --
>>> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>>>
>>