*Question/JA on Deleuze/Totality

[Michael G. Koopman]

Seems your getting a bit whacked over these travels in Pynchon areas
leaving me no understanding why you're so quick to draw conclusions
that players dissing is no hip.  What steps led you to this level of
stance with spin that you slated?

Allow me to reply to your personal note in appreciating both your
choice of animation and arguing I did not intend to plug up any
rheticular, rhizomatic, growth underdevelopment, buddy.  Most need
little help in corking their own.  This being common pork of joke oft
cited by bottle glass, wired, spoon-fed impressionist on isles where
anti-humanist types dwell.  In accepting th-th-that image applied to
myself, I suggest that all animals are equal but many charlatans may
be found.  Chicanery of spell books mops up those who don't meet this
challenge, automatically, so I hears.

Point I meant to express is well summed in 'bookish symmetries'
criticism, although cubists and impressionists certainly differ.

Mike Koopman internet: koopman at ctc.com phone: +1-814-269-2637