M&D Posting Rules

[doktor at primenet.com]

It don't make no nevermind no-how neither to me, since like Don I don't
think that M&D discussion, information and commentary will "spoil" my
reading experience.  There are others on the list, however, who seem to
feel strongly about this, and I think they should be accommodated.

I second the Jester's proposed format, as below.

--Jimmy
  http://www.angelfire.com/oh/Insouciance/index.html



>My 2 cents:
>
>Perhaps we could agree to the following format (taken from suggestions
>posted here the past 2 days)...
>
>Proposed Format:
>
>                Example 1:    SUBJECT: M&D (234) Dixon's Folly
>                Example 2:    SUBJECT: M&D (121) Divining Rod (Info)
>
>Explanation & Rationale:
>
>                Example 1:  Subject line indicates page number the poster has
>                            reached.  The next "term" indicates subject
>                            matter -- can be anything, but is general
>                            discussion matter -- in this case, it's discussion
>                            of some "Dixon's Folly" (conjecture on my part
>--                             not an actual part of the book).
>
>                Example 2:  Subject line also indicates the page number the
>                            poster reached, but the "term" indicates that
>                            the subject matter of the post is essential back-
>                            ground information that could aid the reader.
>
>I hope everyone will consider this format when discussing actual material
>contained within the book. I think it'll be farmore effective than the usual
>"SPOILER" tag tossed into the post.  Just IMHO.  Comments welcome.
>
[snip]
>
>JJ "Jester"
>
>
>