sequels/fan fiction
Bruce Appelbaum
Bruce_Appelbaum at chemsystems.com
Thu Aug 14 11:03:50 CDT 1997
From WJW's website; see the complete text at
http://www.thuntek.net/~walter/war.htm
--------------
Latest bulletin dated 23 June 1997
Hi. My name is Walter Jon Williams, and I'm the author of Hardwired, a
science fiction novel. The novel was written in 1983-4 and published
in 1986, and was (and remains) a big success. It hit the best-seller
list for several months, and it's still in print. It's sold better
than any of my other novels, and it's been translated into Japanese,
German, French, Spanish, Russian, Finnish, Czech, and even Esperanto.
(It's always a kick to read about yourself on dust-jacket copy as a
"priednim autorum kyberpunku.")
The success of the novel resulted in a large number of licensed
Hardwired spin-offs. A license for role-playing games was granted to
R. Talsorian Games in 1989, and the game appeared that year. A license
for a computer game sold to NovaLogic in 1995. A license for action
figures has been sold to the toymaker Hasbro. In 1989, when Infiniti
was introducing their line of cars, they sought a license to use
Hardwired as a part of their successful ad campaign. Permissions were
sought and cheerfully given for the book to be quoted in scientific
literature.
These kind of sublicenses are good things for authors, I should point
out. They publicize the original work in areas where the original
might not otherwise be seen, they often pay better money than writing
fiction, and best of all, they leave the original work alone. Despite
the number of spinoffs I've sold, Hardwired is still there on the
shelves, just as I wrote it fourteen years ago.
Back in 1994 Paramount Pictures, on the point of releasing the film
Johnny Mnemonic, decided they didn't like the original title and
sought a license for Hardwired. Though they offered a significant sum
of money just for the title, I wasn't in love with the idea of putting
my title on William Gibson's movie. (Gibson wasn't exactly delighted
by this development himself).
I turned Paramount down, and Paramount released Johnny Mnemonic under
its original title. This is important. Paramount Pictures-- not
exactly an insignificant player in the world of mass media-- concluded
that I had a moral and legal right to determine what was done with the
title Hardwired. They concluded this in 1994, eight years after the
book was released.
Which brings us to Hard Wired Books, the latest imprint from the fun
folks at Wired.
The first inkling I had of the existence of Hard Wired was early last
year, when their attorneys tried to block NovaLogic from trademarking
their Hardwired CD-Rom game. The game was scheduled to be released in
1996, doubtless bringing fame and large cash rewards to everyone
involved. Wired's insistence that they own everything with the word
"wire" in it caused NovaLogic to leave the scene, dumping the
situation into my lap.
My initial acquaintance with Wired, then, was based on two factors:
1. Their insistence that I have no moral, legal, or financial interest
in Hardwired; and
2. The fact they'd cost me a large sum of money.
The first point is without foundation, legally and morally. It's a lie
so vast it deserves nothing but contempt. I made
a tidy sum selling licenses to Hardwired for years before Wired was
more than a gleam in Louis Rossetto's eye. Even Paramount Pictures
agreed, against their own interests, that I have a vested interest in
this title.
I was first on this turf, and I expect a little respect from
nouveau-riche newcomers like Wired.
Wired's stance-- "I own everything until it's proved that I don't"
--is morally repugnant, not to mention megalomaniacal. They talk like
civil libertarians, but they behave like net nazis. Wired affects
concern about issues of intellectual property, copyright, trademark,
and privacy, but their stance is in contradiction to their brazen
behavior. Their lawyers have been given carte blanche to stomp into
oblivion anyone who dares to use the word "wire" in a way that might
suggest that Wired doesn't own it. Anyone remember Women's Wire?
Another going concern that Wired flattened because it didn't fit into
Wired's grandiose and self-important schemes.
I am not without resources, fortunately, and I don't have to take this
lying down. My attorney and Wired's counsel have been grappling
for over a year, but Wired has yet to make an offer that I can take
seriously.
This week, on May 23rd, I will be giving my deposition as part of the
ongoing trademark dispute. Louis Rossetto will be giving a
deposition at a time yet to be scheduled.
Stay tuned for further bulletins as we march on to victory over the
lickspittle lackeys of lexicographical hegemony.
---snip---
Another Damn Bulletin (June 23)
Word has reached me that Wired is dreadfully upset that I have chosen
to go public in this
way. I am assured that they never meant to restrict my use of
Hardwired.
What do they call a trademark action against one of my licensees?
Chopped liver?
The truth is that they unleashed theirs legal hounds before they even
attempted to make contact with me. The first contact I had with
them was through their lawyers. The only contact I've had with them
was through their lawyers. It's a little late to call it an amiable
misunderstanding.
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: sequels/fan fiction
Author: the Robot Vegetable <veg at teleport.com> at Internet
Date: 8/14/97 8:26 AM
On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Bruce Appelbaum wrote:
> It's interesting that this appears on the Wired website. Wired
and > Walter Jon Williams are currently in a battle over the
rights to the > name HotWired. WJW wrote an SF novel of that
name many years before > Wired/Hotwired existed. WJW retained
rights to the name by refusing
> to allow the movie Johnny Mnemonic to be called Hardwired. A
computer > game of the Hardwired novel is being put together.
I have a copy here at my side. It is _Hardwired_. I thought
you couldn't copyright titles. Did he procure trademark status? That
would seem to be difficult with widespread trade of the mark. The
mark is not effective if you recall the title as _Hotwired_. I am
confused; what exactly if the action he is taking against Wired?
veg
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list