direct hit! GR style
David Casseres
casseres at apple.com
Wed Jul 30 16:38:26 CDT 1997
Andrew sez
>... I find it mighty hard not to
>suspect that Curtis LeMay didn't get a hardon when he got his hands on
>those warheads. Doctor Strangelove is not so far from the truth.
Absolutely. But Slothrop seems almost an antithesis of LeMay; there are
many other characters in Gravity's Rainbow that I would have expected to
tumesce at the proximity of a warhead.
>Slothrop's hardons are induced by Them, the product of indoctrination
>rather than nature. Perhaps what this represents is the subversion of
>the urge to reproduce (i.e. grow) replacing it with the urge to kill
>and destroy, the death wish. Sterility was always a metaphor for the
>nihilism of Them and represents one of Their most powerful weapons,
>subversion of our creativity, furthering their own Death-obsessed
>prodigality, squandering all that lush green potentiality.
I think you're right about all of that. But I also think the idea of the
hardon in the face of death (um, odd choice of words I guess) is so
arresting and so full of potential connections that practically any
analysis of it that makes sense at all has to be understood as part of
the work, since Pynchon has doubtless anticipated a great many different
directions in which the reader could go with it.
Cheers,
David
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list