blaming Clinton
Richard Romeo
richardromeo at hotmail.com
Wed Oct 10 17:27:31 CDT 2001
Terrance--
of course, I don't, dude--I'm talking about the difficulty US
administrations have with supporting regimes that are quite autocratic like
Egypt and Saudia Arabia and rationalizing such a relationship vis a vis
avowed positions regarding freedom, democracy and the like.
It's not perceived favorably in many countries I would think. Kuwait never
did loosen up after the Gulf War, did it?
Such rhetoric taken to an extreme--well, we can see the results. This attack
appears not to be created in a vacuum, you know.
Rich
>From: Terrance <lycidas2 at earthlink.net>
>To: "pynchon-l at waste.org" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
>Subject: Re: blaming Clinton
>Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:48:58 -0400
>
>
>
>Richard Romeo wrote:
> > his administration is partly to blame for sure,
>
>He's to blame for what?
>
>Doug said some have blamed Clinton for 9/11.
>
>This is a stupid thing to say. Bill Clinton's didn't fly a plane into
>the WTC or the Pentagon. The terrorists are responsible for that.
>
>If Clinton is to blame for 9/11 we should put him on trial.
>
>Let those who accuse him of crimes on 9/11 present the facts and
>evidence.
>
>But what should we blame the Clinton administration for?
>
>Want a list? Eight years worth?
>
>
>The alternative press did not spare Clinton. Why would they?
>But it's was a difficult job, why he had "genocide" in Africa, nubile
>long hairs in the White house, frigid wife. No matter where he put that
>cigar he would have trouble.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list