Current reading
Bekah
bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net
Sat Jan 29 19:04:44 CST 2005
At 11:46 PM +0100 1/29/05, Francois Monti wrote:
>Sot-weed Factor by John Barth. Very funny but I'm in the last 150 pages
>and am kinda thinking it's getting a little too long...
I could appreciate very, very few parts of Sot-weed Factor . It was
too dense, too long and too convoluted; the language was too
obviously fabricated. In fact, the book kind of repelled me in the
reverse way that some language draws me in. The language in The
Sot-Weed Factor made me want to push away. I liked the original
poem better. (Now that's not saying much for the book!) (lol)
There were a few parts scattered around the Pocahantas scenes which
were kind of funny if I'm pressured for some kind of positive remark.
I mentioned this to a friend who knows my passion for Mason & Dixon
and he could not figure out why I would like (looorve) Pynchon and
detest Barth; they were the same thing to him. Not so, sayeth I, but
could not fathom the difference. Pynchon is not so dark, or heavy
handed or something. Mason & Dixon is magical. :)
Bekah
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list