pynchon-l-digest V2 #7265

malignd at aol.com malignd at aol.com
Sat Nov 7 21:57:06 CST 2009


<<You *really* like that word, bloviator, don't you?>>

When the shoe fits so well, who needs a thesaurus?

And I didn't ask for a debate with you.  I asked a question.  A quite 
reasonable one.  But you're right:   I do think you're a pompous bag of 
wind.




-----Original Message-----
From: John Carvill <johncarvill at gmail.com>
To: pynchon-l at waste.org
Sent: Sat, Nov 7, 2009 4:35 am
Subject: Re: pynchon-l-digest V2 #7265







>malign:

> Whether you don't like Pynchon's characters because "they're not
> rounded", or because you don't like what Pynchon "does with them", is
> neither here nor there - the 'issue' is still irrelevant.
>
> And why oh great bloviator is it irrelevant?>>

You *really* like that word, bloviator, don't you?

Why, oh great [insert you own insult here, I can't be bothered],
should I enter into a debate with you?










More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list