pynchon-l-digest V2 #7265
malignd at aol.com
malignd at aol.com
Sat Nov 7 21:57:06 CST 2009
<<You *really* like that word, bloviator, don't you?>>
When the shoe fits so well, who needs a thesaurus?
And I didn't ask for a debate with you. I asked a question. A quite
reasonable one. But you're right: I do think you're a pompous bag of
wind.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Carvill <johncarvill at gmail.com>
To: pynchon-l at waste.org
Sent: Sat, Nov 7, 2009 4:35 am
Subject: Re: pynchon-l-digest V2 #7265
>malign:
> Whether you don't like Pynchon's characters because "they're not
> rounded", or because you don't like what Pynchon "does with them", is
> neither here nor there - the 'issue' is still irrelevant.
>
> And why oh great bloviator is it irrelevant?>>
You *really* like that word, bloviator, don't you?
Why, oh great [insert you own insult here, I can't be bothered],
should I enter into a debate with you?
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list