anyone see a Mason & Dixon resonance here?

[David Morris]

The term "homosexual" in its literal meaning doesn't refer exclusively
to males, so "homosocial" could easily include female bonding...

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Heikki Raudaskoski
<hraudask at sun3.oulu.fi> wrote:
> I just meant that "homosocial" is a more apt term than "homoerotic" to describe the numerous male couples in Am Lit. I don't want to stick to currently fashionable neologisms for their own sake.