Horst-Maxine-Windust

[alice malice]

But the connections are knotted in and out to advance a few at the expense
of the majority. The connection is there, sure, thus are we as slaves ever
connected with  kidnappers and those who betray our brothers, those who
were tossed to the sharks in the middle passage, those who passed, or sold
themselves or their brothers...all connected sure...in paranoid chains of
iron and daisies,  but America, in her magic moments,  in the cusps of
historical subjunctive, when the possibility of connection through a
cultural transformation is glimpsed, if only in fleeting fibers woven,
woofed and warped, and by remembrances and narratives fondly fondled and
made fabric of fictions...but always the grim strand wolf, what great big
camera eyes he has! and the better to pick the whale carcass clean and dry
up the mat making, the weaving, the ever entangled in revolution, in
mutiny, in the marraige of men through labor.


On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:27 AM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> Interbeing.  Nothing is not connected.
>
>
> On Saturday, February 22, 2014, <bandwraith at aol.com> wrote:
>
>> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140220112515.htm
>>
>>
>> In a paper published this week in the journal Physical Review Letters,
>> MIT researchers propose an experiment that may close the last major
>> loophole of Bell's inequality -- a 50-year-old theorem that, if
>> violated by experiments, would mean that our universe is based
>> not on the textbook laws of classical physics, but on the less tangible
>> probabilities of quantum mechanics.
>>
>> Such a quantum view would allow for seemimgly counterintuitive
>> phenomenon such as entanglement...
>>
>> Among other things, entanglement -- a quantum feature Albert Einstein
>> skeptically referred to as "spooky action at a distance" -- seems to
>> suggest that entangled particles can affect each other instantly,
>> faster than the speed of light...
>>
>> Though two major loopholes have since been closed, a third remains;
>> physicists refer to it as "setting indepedence," or more provocatively,
>> "free will." This loophole proposes that a particle detector's settings
>> may "conspire" with events in the shared causal past of the detectors
>> themselves to determine which properties of the particle to measure -
>> a scenario that, however far-fetched, implies that a physicist running
>> the experiment does not have complete free will in choosing each
>> detector's setting. Such a scenario would result in biased
>> measurements, suggesting that two particles are correlated more
>> than they actually are, and giving more weight to quantum mechanics
>> than classical physics.
>>
>>
>> "Dogs run free...why not me?"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20140222/03b1b40e/attachment.html>