Horst-Maxine-Windust

[Indel Icate]

Yes it is.

And to whom it feels desolate, there is always a joiningness amongst us.

I came on here, this Pynchon line, 12 minutes ago.  And I was looking at
All-Is_Good_InThe -World's endless fortitude.

And then, at that moment, this moment, now, now, .... you appeared.

I don't believe that anybody is watching this channel.  But i want to show
you something.  It's Louis CK.  Season 2.  The episode Pamela, and then
Eddie.  You have to have Netflix.  Shit, I get it from somewhere else, I'll
give you the code if you want.

The Pamela episode is the greatest love of all, in television history.




On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:36 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> II,
> It isn ice to b eloved.
> Thx,
> David Morris
>
>
> On Saturday, February 22, 2014, Indel Icate <
> indelicateexplasions at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> David I always love you.
>>
>> Always.
>>
>> All ways.  Any ways.
>>
>> An. Ea.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 9:27 AM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Interbeing.  Nothing is not connected.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, February 22, 2014, <bandwraith at aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140220112515.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In a paper published this week in the journal Physical Review Letters,
>>>> MIT researchers propose an experiment that may close the last major
>>>> loophole of Bell's inequality -- a 50-year-old theorem that, if
>>>> violated by experiments, would mean that our universe is based
>>>> not on the textbook laws of classical physics, but on the less tangible
>>>> probabilities of quantum mechanics.
>>>>
>>>> Such a quantum view would allow for seemimgly counterintuitive
>>>> phenomenon such as entanglement...
>>>>
>>>> Among other things, entanglement -- a quantum feature Albert Einstein
>>>> skeptically referred to as "spooky action at a distance" -- seems to
>>>> suggest that entangled particles can affect each other instantly,
>>>> faster than the speed of light...
>>>>
>>>> Though two major loopholes have since been closed, a third remains;
>>>> physicists refer to it as "setting indepedence," or more provocatively,
>>>> "free will." This loophole proposes that a particle detector's settings
>>>> may "conspire" with events in the shared causal past of the detectors
>>>> themselves to determine which properties of the particle to measure -
>>>> a scenario that, however far-fetched, implies that a physicist running
>>>> the experiment does not have complete free will in choosing each
>>>> detector's setting. Such a scenario would result in biased
>>>> measurements, suggesting that two particles are correlated more
>>>> than they actually are, and giving more weight to quantum mechanics
>>>> than classical physics.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Dogs run free...why not me?"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
>>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20140223/9174f779/attachment.html>