Horst-Maxine-Windust

[David Morris]

II,
It isn ice to b eloved.
Thx,
David Morris

On Saturday, February 22, 2014, Indel Icate <indelicateexplasions at gmail.com>
wrote:

> David I always love you.
>
> Always.
>
> All ways.  Any ways.
>
> An. Ea.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 9:27 AM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','fqmorris at gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> Interbeing.  Nothing is not connected.
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, February 22, 2014, <bandwraith at aol.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bandwraith at aol.com');>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140220112515.htm
>>>
>>>
>>> In a paper published this week in the journal Physical Review Letters,
>>> MIT researchers propose an experiment that may close the last major
>>> loophole of Bell's inequality -- a 50-year-old theorem that, if
>>> violated by experiments, would mean that our universe is based
>>> not on the textbook laws of classical physics, but on the less tangible
>>> probabilities of quantum mechanics.
>>>
>>> Such a quantum view would allow for seemimgly counterintuitive
>>> phenomenon such as entanglement...
>>>
>>> Among other things, entanglement -- a quantum feature Albert Einstein
>>> skeptically referred to as "spooky action at a distance" -- seems to
>>> suggest that entangled particles can affect each other instantly,
>>> faster than the speed of light...
>>>
>>> Though two major loopholes have since been closed, a third remains;
>>> physicists refer to it as "setting indepedence," or more provocatively,
>>> "free will." This loophole proposes that a particle detector's settings
>>> may "conspire" with events in the shared causal past of the detectors
>>> themselves to determine which properties of the particle to measure -
>>> a scenario that, however far-fetched, implies that a physicist running
>>> the experiment does not have complete free will in choosing each
>>> detector's setting. Such a scenario would result in biased
>>> measurements, suggesting that two particles are correlated more
>>> than they actually are, and giving more weight to quantum mechanics
>>> than classical physics.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Dogs run free...why not me?"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20140222/1d9a3066/attachment.html>