Re: Few outside the Russian propaganda bubble ever seriously entertained the Kremlin’s line.

[alice malice]

Characterize it as you wish, but the fact is, you don't know. I don't
know either. Time may make things known to us that will change our
views, but for now, we simply don't have enough good facts to take a
position. Nevertheless, the story in the NYT is plausible.

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Eckhardt
<thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:
> Am 04.01.2015 18:15, schrieb alice malice:
>>
>> Few outside the Russian propaganda bubble ever seriously entertained
>> the Kremlin’s line. But almost a year after the fall of Mr.
>> Yanukovych’s government, questions remain about how and why it
>> collapsed so quickly and completely.
>
>
> You don't say?
>
> I'd characterise this as "preemptive truth" (well, fragments of the truth).
> Note the name "Andriy Parubiy". Parubiy was the guy who made things happen.
>
> Meanwhile, the Atlantic Council is desperately trying to put some distance
> between the Ukrainian government and its neo-Nazi death squads, shedding
> some truth along the way:
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-rise-of-warlords-threatens-ukraines-recovery/2014/12/30/a23b2d36-8f7b-11e4-a412-4b735edc7175_story.html
>
> Thomas
>
>
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l