A Ranking of Pynchon's Novels

kelber at mindspring.com kelber at mindspring.com
Thu Jul 23 13:48:30 CDT 2015


Not surprising that the most filmable is the least liked.

LK
-----Original Message-----

From: Heikki R 

Sent: Jul 23, 2015 5:27 AM

To: pynchon -l 

Subject: Re: A Ranking of Pynchon's Novels




Current standings (21 respondents) on a scale of 1 (least good) to 8 (best):

1. Gravity's Rainbow     (156 points - average 7,43)2. Mason & Dixon         (131 points - average 6,24)3. V.                            (108,5 points - average 5,17)4. The Crying of Lot 49  (96 points - average 4,57)5. Against the Day        (82,5 points - average 3,93)6. Vineland                   (77 points - average 3,67)7. Bleeding Edge          (50 points - average 2,38)8. Inherent Vice            (40 points - average 1,90)

The results/averages are not wholly reliable as not every respondent ranked all the novels. I ignored Slow Learner.

Heikki
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com> wrote:
"Could he [Wm. Slothrop] have been the fork in the road America never

took, the singular point she jumped the wrong way from? ... It seems

to Tyrone Slothrop that there might be a route back." (GR, Pt. III, p.

556)



http://www.ottosell.de/pynchon/rainbow.htm



On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Kai Frederik Lorentzen

<lorentzen at hotmail.de> wrote:

>

>> That sense of contingency, that sense that things could have been

>> different, speaks to me, and I find it missing in GR ... <

>

> There you speak from an American perspective. For me, as a German person,

> "Gravity's Rainbow" has this sense of contingency because it asks why we did

> become Nazi Germany in the 1930s and what, actually and virtually, happened

> to Germany during the 1940s. In this regard the only novel that can compete

> with "Gravity's Rainbow" is "Doktor Faustus" by Thomas Mann, which was

> written in LA too. Paradoxically, the fact that Pynchon knew relatively

> little about Germany enabled him to evoke something crucial; and certain

> zeitgeist circumstances, like Acid or the war in Vietnam, helped him to

> create a picture of Nazi Germany that in many aspects shows more of the

> actual reality than the moralist tales of writers like Böll and Grass;

> referring to the Holocaust only indirectly is part of this writing strategy.

> I know, "Pynchon deserves to be honored as an American patriot" (Naumann),

> but I read him from my German perspective, too. The few true works of

> "Weltliteratur" (Goethe), and "Gravity's Rainbow" certainly belongs to this

> exquisite canon, deserve more than just one and the same reading. And then

> "Gravity's Rainbow" is 760 pages not flash prose but poetry ...

>

> In the cases of both, "Mason & Dixon"  and "Against the Day," I feel the

> idea to be much better than the result. I guess the fact that these books

> were long, actually too long in the pipeline plays an important role here.

> Like Walter Benjamin had it: "Das Werk ist die Totenmaske der Konzeption."

> The (finished) work of art is the death mask of conception. The letters are

> there on the page, but the artistic thrill is gone ...

>

> "Bleeding Edge," where Pynchon - focusing on digitalization and terrorism -

> returns to the GR question of technology and control, and "Vineland" show

> Pynchon II in full bloom, an author who, while having a family of his own

> relatively late in life, discovers the loyalties and disloyalties of blood

> ... I also think that these two are the funniest works of Pynchon.

>

>

>

> On 23.07.2015 03:39, Robert Mahnke wrote:

>

> David said, "the fact that not everyone agrees that GR is Pynchon's

> masterpiece make some of wonder what's wrong with those that don't. We could

> start flame wars about these differences. That might be illuminating, and

> fun..."

>

> Since I was one of the (few) people who didn't rank GR first, let me try to

> shed some light, but not heat.  The most recent time I re-read GR, I was as

> impressed as ever with it intellectually, but it didn't seem as human as

> M&D.  Maybe a central question of M&D is, Why did we end up with this

> country instead of another?  That's question in many of Pynchon's novels

> (AtD (this world instead of another) and both Inherent Vice and Vineland

> (this California instead of another). That sense of contingency, that sense

> that things could have been different, speaks to me, and I find it missing

> in GR (and V and TCoL49 before it), where there is such a strong sense of

> predetermination, of the discovery of a hidden order and conspiracy, whether

> in the pattern of the V-2s falling on London or the printed-circuit-like

> layout of San Narciso. I'm presenting this as a dichotomy, but of course

> something of that sense of another country is in the earlier books, for

> example in a great passage just before the end of TCoL49 which I can't find

> online just now.  Still, from this perspective you can be impressed by the

> intellectual pyrotechnics of GR (it is second on my list, after all), and

> yet still think of it as a not-yet-matured work relative to M&D.  If Pynchon

> had written M&D in the 70s and GR two decades later, might their relative

> statures in everyone's eyes be the reverse?

>

> Those are just a few thoughts tonight. I reserve the right to change my mind

> completely tomorrow.

>

> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:58 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

>>

>> Those that have read all of Pynchon's novels are familiar with each ones

>> qualities and differences. Thus there is a common unspoken understanding of

>> the overall picture. But the fact that not everyone agrees that GR is

>> Pynchon's masterpiece make some of wonder what's wrong with those that

>> don't. We could start flame wars about these differences. That might be

>> illuminating, and fun...

>>

>> David Morris

>>

>> On Wednesday, July 22, 2015, Conor McDade <fpsconor at gmail.com> wrote:

>>>

>>> I am only a youth, so I apologize for my naivete, but what is the point

>>> of these lists without providing any insight as to why you listed them in

>>> such order? Is it simply to see how people's tastes vary?

>>>

>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Chris v <traditionalgb at gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>

>>>> 1. AtD

>>>> 2. M&D

>>>> 3. GR

>>>> 4. VL

>>>> 5. IV

>>>> 6. CoL49

>>>> 7. V.

>>>> 8. SL

>>>> 9. BE (haven't read yet)

>>>>

>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com>

>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>> Why doesn't Ms. Jackson (and Thomas) make that happen, you think? Why

>>>>> wasn't there a 50th Anniversary edition Of V? seems about every modern "

>>>>> classic" was so " honored" Think Pynchon does not believe in such

>>>>> anniversary editions?

>>>>>

>>>>> Sent from my iPad

>>>>>

>>>>> On Jul 22, 2015, at 3:51 AM, James Robertson

>>>>> <james at themutedposthorn.com> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>> I sure wish someone would record an audiobook of V, and Vineland. That

>>>>> new George Guidall version of GR is marvellous.

>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 at 8:48 pm jochen stremmel <jstremmel at gmail.com>

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>> 2nd that!

>>>>>>

>>>>>> 2015-07-22 9:55 GMT+02:00 Heikki R

>>>>>> <situations.journeys.comedy at gmail.com>:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> 1. Gravity's Rainbow

>>>>>>> 2. V.

>>>>>>> 3. Mason & Dixon

>>>>>>> 4. The Crying of Lot 49

>>>>>>> 5. Vineland

>>>>>>> 6. Against the Day

>>>>>>> 7. Inherent Vice

>>>>>>> 8. Bleeding Edge

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> In fact, on a couple of occasions, the contestants were

>>>>>>> shoulder-to-shoulder. But I decided to avoid ties (perhaps for tactical

>>>>>>> reasons).

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Heikki

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 7:02 AM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>

>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Eaux Contraire!

>>>>>>>> Inclusion is de facto non-flame. Love is the answer.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> David Morris

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 21, 2015, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com>

>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> ...  speaking of flame wars ...

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:04 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>

>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> > Elected Officials are all we got in this semi-democracy. Love it

>>>>>>>>> > or Leave

>>>>>>>>> > it.

>>>>>>>>> >

>>>>>>>>> > We need to embrace democracy, with all its warts. We are

>>>>>>>>> > extremely lucky to

>>>>>>>>> > be living in a place where we would want to discuss this

>>>>>>>>> > abstraction.

>>>>>>>>> >

>>>>>>>>> > David Morris

>>>>>>>>> >

>>>>>>>>> >

>>>>>>>>> > On Tuesday, July 21, 2015, Dave Monroe

>>>>>>>>> > <against.the.dave at gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> >>

>>>>>>>>> >> Americans will vote for almost anything except elected

>>>>>>>>> >> officials.

>>>>>>>>> >>

>>>>>>>>> >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:33 PM, David Morris

>>>>>>>>> >> <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> >> > Voting is so American Idol!  I want my choice to win!

>>>>>>>>> >> > Face facts: Votes aren't gunna be backed up by essays.

>>>>>>>>> >> > David Morris

>>>>>>>>> >> >

>>>>>>>>> >> >

>>>>>>>>> >> > On Tuesday, July 21, 2015, John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com>

>>>>>>>>> >> > wrote:

>>>>>>>>> >> >>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> No, it just means that mathematical averages cannot capture

>>>>>>>>> >> >> the

>>>>>>>>> >> >> delightful diversity of our responses! Collating the

>>>>>>>>> >> >> different lists

>>>>>>>>> >> >> into one loses something the way that a plot summary of a P

>>>>>>>>> >> >> novel will

>>>>>>>>> >> >> never suffice.

>>>>>>>>> >> >>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:10 PM, David Ewers

>>>>>>>>> >> >> <dsewers at comcast.net>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> >> >> > I feel so redundant!

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >

>>>>>>>>> >> >> > On Jul 21, 2015, at 6:53 PM Jolly good day we are having,

>>>>>>>>> >> >> > John Bailey

>>>>>>>>> >> >> > wrote:

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> The order seems to remain the same.

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:55 AM, David Ewers

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> <dsewers at comcast.net>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> Me too!

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> 1. V.

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> 2. Gravity's Rainbow

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> 3. Mason & Dixon

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> 4/5. Against the Day

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> 4/5. Crying of Lot 49

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> 6. Vineland

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> 7. Inherent Vice

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> 8. Bleeding Edge

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> On Jul 21, 2015, at 6:22 PM Jolly good day we are having,

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> Mark

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> Thibodeau

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> I love the diversity of opinions, too, but I'm kind of

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> surprised at

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> how bad

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> V. is faring!

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> MT/J

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Ian Livingston

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> <igrlivingston at gmail.com>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> Love the diversity of rankings in rating one great

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> author. Rather

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> like six

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> blind men describing an elephant. We each have our

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> opinions and

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> our

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> reasons

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> for them. I love GR, I truly do, and it may be the

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> greater work

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> for

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> all it

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> did to shape postmodernism, but:

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> 1. M&D

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> 2. GR

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> 3. AtD

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> 4. V. / COL 49  (tie)

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> 5. Vineland

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> 6. BE

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> 7. IV

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> 8. Slow Learner

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:48 PM, glenn fuller

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> <glennfuller at sbcglobal.net>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> G.R.

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> A.t.D.

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> T.C.O.L.49

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> Vineland

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> M&D

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> I.V.

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> B.E.

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>> V

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>

>>>>>>>>> >> >> >

>>>>>>>>> >> >> -

>>>>>>>>> >> >> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>

>

-

Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list