BtZ42 Section 9 (pp 53-60): the sieve of chance
kelber at mindspring.com
kelber at mindspring.com
Fri May 13 11:47:00 CDT 2016
Sort of the Byron the Bulb issue: is the long-burning bulb asserting it's will, magical, technologically-tampered or just sitting comfortably at the outermost extremes of the bell curve?
Laura
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
Monte Davis <montedavis49 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>But once it *has* settled...
>
>That's the crux, and a starting point for a fascinating (some other time) excursus into Bayesian probability. We do much more anthropomorphizing and projection than we know, and a some level we'll always feel that the roulette ball has a memory and "knows" it should start evening things out by settling on red. That feeling grows much faster than the unlikelihood of any given run of black does -- which is why more players flocked to make ever larger bets on red, and overall the casino did very well that night.
>
>
>
>> It would have been the same probability even if the ball at that point had settled on black for a few million times in a row, no?
>
>
>Yes -- aside from the likelihood that you would long since have concluded the wheel must be rigged :-)
>
>
>
>On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Thomas Eckhardt <thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>
> Monte Davis <montedavis49 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>P. 56:
>
>“But squares that have already* had* several hits, I mean—”
>
>“I’m sorry. That’s the Monte Carlo Fallacy..."
>
>
>I look at it like this: It is highly unlikely that the roulette ball settles on black for 26 times in a row. But once it *has* settled on black for 26 times in a row, the probability for it to do so again with the next spin of the wheel is the same as before (48.6 per cent, that is).
>
>At least that's how I explain it to the kids...
>
>Where the bettors went wrong was that 26 spins of a roulette wheel simply isn't that large a number.
>
>
>Hmmm. It would have been the same probability even if the ball at that point had settled on black for a few million times in a row, no?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20160513/1a15af9f/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list