Fwd: Bleeding Edge

[Mark Kohut]

I think the wonderfulness of *Bleeding Edge, *among other things, is that
THERE is no literal conspiracy theory
in it. ......Even the most literal thing, the stock market manipulation, is
causally unknown in it and in life still, I believe.

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:16 PM Thomas Eckhardt <thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de>
wrote:

> My reply to rich wasn't meant insultingly at all. The idea behind it was
> that some of the characters in the book support theories that might not
> seem appropriate to journalists writing about the topic of 9/11 in fiction.
>
> Am 11.09.2021 um 00:02 schrieb David Morris:
> > Sorry,  I’d meant my email to go to the whole list.
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > From: David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: Bleeding Edge
> > To: Thomas Eckhardt <thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de>
> >
> >
> > That you “don’t find curious at all” something that Rich does find
> curious
> > *seems*, at best, a pretty useless comment, and, is more easily can be
> seen
> > as an insultingly comment.  If you had a useful point, it’s hard to find
> it…
> >
> > Maybe that feeling on my part is because I can imagine all kinds of 9-11
> > possible connections to BE.  And, after all, TRP does live in NYC.  Of
> > course TRP ain’t a mainstream author, but he’s also a kind of a cult
> > celebrity.
> >
> > David Morris
>
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>