NP - Chemical Weapons Used in Syria... (or WERE they?)

[Mark Thibodeau]

I urge everyone to check out the links that Eckhardt has provided us with.
They are the most self-defeating, disgustingly anti-human collections of
black propaganda that I have had the displeasure of perusing.

Openly mocking the searing suffering of children burned to a crisp by
incendiary bombs, quibbling over the most idiotic of minor details as tho
these definitively disprove the fact of the horrors that are clearly on
display in those videos.

Eckhardt. Have you ever been seriously burned? Have you ever seen seriously
burned people in the flesh, before treatment? I have. That Darwish child in
the videos, whatever the appearance of the cream smeared "above" or "on"
his lip (yes, believe it or not, this plays into the hoax-claimers'
narrative), is suffering severe, REAL burns. I cannot begin to imagine the
agony he is enduring.

And yet... "HE NODS AT THE START! HE NODS!!!! IT'S ALL A FAKE!!!!"

It's almost incomprehensibly disgusting.

YOU are disgusting.

J.


On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Thomas Eckhardt <
thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:

> Exactly. The White Helmets (founded and trained by "former" British
> officer James Le Mesurier in Gaziantep, Turkey, funded by the UK, the US,
> the Netherlands, Germany, France etc. to the tune of 100 to 200 million
> dollars, working only in territory held by Islamists and leaving with the
> Islamists when they are driven out, and always immediately present at every
> alleged atrocity site with their cameras, saving children from the rubble
> TM and even cats as if in a parody of "Wag the Dog", except it couldn't be
> more serious because children and cats always work), the Syrian American
> Medical Society and Doctors Under Fire (one of whose directors is Hamish de
> Bretton-Gordon, a "former" "commanding officer of the UK Chemical,
> Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Regiment and Nato’s Rapid
> Reaction CBRN Battalion" who writes for the Guardian and Bellingcat and is
> consulted as an expert by everybody and works closely with Ian Panell who
> directed the BBC-"documentary" "Saving Syria's Children" which contains
> staged scenes of atrocity propaganda as documented on
> https://bbcpanoramasavingsyriaschildren.wordpress.com/ where you can see
> the incriminated scene on the top of the page (and if you believe that this
> is authentic, you'll believe anything), and who also trained Syrian doctors
> with regard to CW (taking samples etc.) as early as 2013, perhaps even
> 2012, brought back samples of CW from Syria, analysed them and with
> gravitas assessed the findings which invariably pointed to Syrian
> culpability and still has an office at Porton Down despite being retired
> from service and is the supposedly objective expert on all matters
> concerning CW in the Western Press) are organisations that have been
> founded and are being funded as we speak precisely for the purpose of
> shoveling atrocity propaganda to the Western media who uncritically accept
> it and built the desired narrative.
>
> If we survive this, the media will say that they have been played. This is
> not the case. They are part of the propaganda machine.
>
> But it is not only the media. It is also the OPCW which bases its report
> about Khan Sheikoun in which they say that they are "confident that the
> Syrian Arab Republic is responsible for the release of sarin at Khan
> Shaykhun on 4 April 2017" (this is what Mark Kohut keeps taunting me about)
> mainly on the accounts of eyewitnesses and activists because they could not
> enter the area because the "moderate rebels" would have chopped their heads
> off and also without a chain of custody as it was the White Helmets who
> brought the samples to Turkey which would not hold water in any courtroom
> in the civilized world but seems to suffice to risk WW III and all the
> while not letting the fact that many people were admitted to hospitals
> before the attack took place ("Certain irregularities were observed in
> elements of information analysed. For example, several hospitals appeared
> to start admitting casualties of the attack between 0640 and 0645 hours.
> The Mechanism received the medical records of 247 patients from Khan
> Shaykhun who were admitted to various health-care facilities, including
> those of survivors and a number of victims who died from exposure to a
> chemical agent") about which the late, great Robert Parry had something to
> say in https://consortiumnews.com/2017/09/07/a-new-hole-in-syria-
> sarin-certainty/.
>
> So, fast forward to now: Assad has no motive whatsoever to use CW unless
> he has a secret wish to die with a bayonet up his ass and have some
> psychopath politician in Washington cackle about his death. The only
> counter argument, if you want to call it that, is that Assad is an evil
> dictator and that evil dictators just want to butcher their own people and
> end up with a bayonet etc. because, you know, this is what evil dictators
> do. It does not hold water. As the former ambassador of the UK to Syria,
> Peter Ford, stated: "Assad may be cruel, he may be brutal, but he is not
> stupid." Primary school children understand that....
>
> (To give you some help here, Mark, Juan Cole has a better argument, not
> much better, granted, but not as insulting to the intellect as the one that
> you forward, perhaps you should use that one).
>
> But ok, if the evidence says it was Assad, it was Assad, however insane it
> seems. So, where is the evidence? Videos and "eyewitness accounts" of the
> White Helmets and the SAMS, says Macron, says May, says Merkel, says Trump,
> says the WHO, say the Western media, suffice to bring the world to WW III.
> For a detailed analysis of the videos presented, see:
>
> http://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/04/syria-manipulated-video
> s-fail-to-launch-world-war-iii.html
>
> But of course, Trump didn't need no stinkin'evidence. Although this is the
> first time that OPCW inspectors are able to work on the ground on the
> invitation of the Syrian government, with Russia guaranteeing their safety,
> because the "moderate rebels" have left the scene, the US, the UK and
> France decided to strike before the OPCW investigations even started. What
> kind of person would not be thinking of the prelude to the Iraq War? Only
> Putin and Assad apologists, of course.
>
> The prelude to this was the completely absurd story about Vladimir Putin
> (evil mastermind, lest we forget) sending professional assassins of his
> secret service to Britain in order to kill a retired double-agent, whom he
> could have killed for several years with no repercussions at all in Russia
> but decided for some nefarious reason to keep alive, with the most deadly
> nerve agent the world has ever seen, only to find out that the targets,
> against all odds, survived.
>
> Again: If you believe this, you'll believe everything.
>
> And not only the British government, the whole Western media have been
> lying about this. Obviously.
>
> If anyone wants sources, I'll provide them.
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>